<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 253 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408357</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 12.50 lakhs as unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, with a minor adjustment for household expenses. The appeal was partly allowed, granting relief of Rs. 3 lakhs against the CIT (A)&#039;s estimate of household expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing sufficient evidence to justify sources of investment and the correct application of Section 69 in cases where such evidence is lacking.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 09:10:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 253 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408357</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 12.50 lakhs as unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, with a minor adjustment for household expenses. The appeal was partly allowed, granting relief of Rs. 3 lakhs against the CIT (A)&#039;s estimate of household expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing sufficient evidence to justify sources of investment and the correct application of Section 69 in cases where such evidence is lacking.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>