<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 232 - PATIALA HOUSE COURTS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408336</link>
    <description>Bail in a GST input tax credit fraud allegation was assessed on settled considerations of liberty, custodial necessity, flight risk, and possible interference with evidence. The Court noted that the accused had joined investigation, had been examined in custody, and no material showed an attempt to abscond or any need for further custodial interrogation. It also considered the accused&#039;s age, prior heart surgery, and the wife&#039;s medical condition. A retracted statement under section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was held insufficient by itself to justify continued detention. Bail was granted subject to conditions safeguarding cooperation and the evidentiary process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 232 - PATIALA HOUSE COURTS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408336</link>
      <description>Bail in a GST input tax credit fraud allegation was assessed on settled considerations of liberty, custodial necessity, flight risk, and possible interference with evidence. The Court noted that the accused had joined investigation, had been examined in custody, and no material showed an attempt to abscond or any need for further custodial interrogation. It also considered the accused&#039;s age, prior heart surgery, and the wife&#039;s medical condition. A retracted statement under section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was held insufficient by itself to justify continued detention. Bail was granted subject to conditions safeguarding cooperation and the evidentiary process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>