https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408335 The court denied bail to the applicant, emphasizing the seriousness of economic offenses under the CGST Act, particularly related to duty evasion through fake invoices. The court found the applicant's involvement in issuing fake invoices without supplying goods, leading to wrongful tax credit utilization, as established based on evidence. Considering the gravity of the allegations and the non-bailable nature of the offense under Section 132(1)(b), bail was denied to the applicant to prevent revenue loss and ensure economic offenders are held accountable. en-us Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408335 The court denied bail to the applicant, emphasizing the seriousness of economic offenses under the CGST Act, particularly related to duty evasion through fake invoices. The court found the applicant's involvement in issuing fake invoices without supplying goods, leading to wrongful tax credit utilization, as established based on evidence. Considering the gravity of the allegations and the non-bailable nature of the offense under Section 132(1)(b), bail was denied to the applicant to prevent revenue loss and ensure economic offenders are held accountable. Case-Laws GST Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408335