<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1625 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295516</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict disallowance of expenses under Section 14A to the extent of exempt income, citing judicial precedents. It also affirmed the treatment of revenue expenditure on professional and legal fees as revenue in nature. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection, supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings on the issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 09:09:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1625 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295516</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict disallowance of expenses under Section 14A to the extent of exempt income, citing judicial precedents. It also affirmed the treatment of revenue expenditure on professional and legal fees as revenue in nature. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection, supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings on the issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>