<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1750 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295512</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the assessment reopening was invalid as it was done beyond the statutory period without any fault on the assessee&#039;s side. The original assessment was completed within the prescribed timeframe, and the assessee had provided all necessary details. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of adhering to procedural requirements and evaluating the validity of reopening assessments under the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 09:09:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1750 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295512</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the assessment reopening was invalid as it was done beyond the statutory period without any fault on the assessee&#039;s side. The original assessment was completed within the prescribed timeframe, and the assessee had provided all necessary details. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of adhering to procedural requirements and evaluating the validity of reopening assessments under the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>