https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295524 The court dismissed the company petition as it was not proven that the respondent-company was liable to pay the outstanding amount. The judge emphasized the lack of evidence establishing the respondent's liability and the need for detailed evidence to conclusively determine liability. Due to the absence of sufficient proof of liability on the part of the respondent-company, the court found the petition lacked merit and dismissed it under relevant sections of the Companies Act, 1956. en-us Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2021 09:09:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295524 The court dismissed the company petition as it was not proven that the respondent-company was liable to pay the outstanding amount. The judge emphasized the lack of evidence establishing the respondent's liability and the need for detailed evidence to conclusively determine liability. Due to the absence of sufficient proof of liability on the part of the respondent-company, the court found the petition lacked merit and dismissed it under relevant sections of the Companies Act, 1956. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295524