<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1168 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295530</link>
    <description>In a company law proceeding before the NCLT, Chennai, the tribunal recorded appearances of counsel for the petitioner and several respondents and allowed the urgent application filed in the matter. The text does not set out any detailed reasoning on the merits; it only reflects that the interlocutory request was permitted in the pending corporate dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 09:09:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1168 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295530</link>
      <description>In a company law proceeding before the NCLT, Chennai, the tribunal recorded appearances of counsel for the petitioner and several respondents and allowed the urgent application filed in the matter. The text does not set out any detailed reasoning on the merits; it only reflects that the interlocutory request was permitted in the pending corporate dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>