<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1283 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295506</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the CIT(Appeals) order for the assessment year 2003-2004. The Tribunal deleted the additions of Rs. 1,58,217 and Rs. 3,10,941 made by the authorities regarding agricultural income, as there was no evidence of income from sources other than agriculture. The Tribunal found the additions unjustified and lacking proper justification, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2021 18:25:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1283 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295506</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the CIT(Appeals) order for the assessment year 2003-2004. The Tribunal deleted the additions of Rs. 1,58,217 and Rs. 3,10,941 made by the authorities regarding agricultural income, as there was no evidence of income from sources other than agriculture. The Tribunal found the additions unjustified and lacking proper justification, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>