<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1164 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295502</link>
    <description>The court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner&#039;s grievance regarding missing communication for the Computer Proficiency Test in a recruitment process by the Central Recruitment Agency of Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court. Emphasizing the necessity for applicants to monitor their Email accounts as per the advertisement conditions, the court rejected the plea for a special chance, highlighting the importance of adhering to the selection process timeline to ensure fairness and avoid arbitrariness. The court also affirmed the requirement of Email communication for all candidates, including rural applicants, as a progressive and fair method in line with technological advancements, dismissing the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2021 10:30:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1164 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295502</link>
      <description>The court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner&#039;s grievance regarding missing communication for the Computer Proficiency Test in a recruitment process by the Central Recruitment Agency of Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court. Emphasizing the necessity for applicants to monitor their Email accounts as per the advertisement conditions, the court rejected the plea for a special chance, highlighting the importance of adhering to the selection process timeline to ensure fairness and avoid arbitrariness. The court also affirmed the requirement of Email communication for all candidates, including rural applicants, as a progressive and fair method in line with technological advancements, dismissing the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>