https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295501 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling in favor of the respondent. The court found that the respondent was not at fault for sending the communication to one of the provided email addresses, which was treated as spam. It was determined that the delay and prejudice suffered by the petitioner were a result of their own negligence in checking the email addresses regularly. Additionally, the court concluded that the tender process was conducted fairly without any arbitrariness or violation of natural justice principles. The delay in approaching the court also impacted the petitioner's challenge to the bidding process. en-us Fri, 07 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jun 2021 10:19:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295501 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling in favor of the respondent. The court found that the respondent was not at fault for sending the communication to one of the provided email addresses, which was treated as spam. It was determined that the delay and prejudice suffered by the petitioner were a result of their own negligence in checking the email addresses regularly. Additionally, the court concluded that the tender process was conducted fairly without any arbitrariness or violation of natural justice principles. The delay in approaching the court also impacted the petitioner's challenge to the bidding process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295501