https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408325 Admission of the cheque and promissory note signatures, coupled with dishonour for insufficiency of funds and service of statutory notice, triggered the presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in favour of the payee. As the accused led no defence evidence and failed to rebut the presumption of a legally enforceable debt or liability, the concurrent findings of guilt were not shown to suffer from jurisdictional error or illegality. The conviction under Section 138 was therefore upheld in revision, and the modified sentence and compensation remained undisturbed. en-us Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jun 2021 08:37:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408325 Admission of the cheque and promissory note signatures, coupled with dishonour for insufficiency of funds and service of statutory notice, triggered the presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in favour of the payee. As the accused led no defence evidence and failed to rebut the presumption of a legally enforceable debt or liability, the concurrent findings of guilt were not shown to suffer from jurisdictional error or illegality. The conviction under Section 138 was therefore upheld in revision, and the modified sentence and compensation remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408325