<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 212 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408316</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s orders, confirming the deletion of additions related to interest on FDs and unutilized revenue grants, and the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal emphasized the change in government policy, the principle of consistency, and the concept of diversion of income by overriding title.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2021 08:37:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 212 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408316</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s orders, confirming the deletion of additions related to interest on FDs and unutilized revenue grants, and the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal emphasized the change in government policy, the principle of consistency, and the concept of diversion of income by overriding title.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>