<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (9) TMI 20 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25615</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the revision petitions, holding that there was a prima facie case of non-deduction/short deduction of tax under section 276B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was determined that a firm could be prosecuted under section 276B and punished with a fine, partners could be charged based on the evidence, the charges were detailed and not vague, and mens rea was not necessary for conviction under section 276B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:09:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (9) TMI 20 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25615</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the revision petitions, holding that there was a prima facie case of non-deduction/short deduction of tax under section 276B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was determined that a firm could be prosecuted under section 276B and punished with a fine, partners could be charged based on the evidence, the charges were detailed and not vague, and mens rea was not necessary for conviction under section 276B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>