<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 187 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408291</link>
    <description>A struck-off company may be restored to the register under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 where the record shows continuing business activity and a bona fide willingness to cure pending statutory non-compliances. Audited balance sheets and other materials supported the company&#039;s claim of ongoing operations, and the Tribunal treated restoration as justified in the interests of the company, its shareholders, and creditors. Objections based on prior non-filing and reference to disqualification under Section 164(2) did not prevent revival on the facts presented, and restoration of the company&#039;s name was ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2021 08:36:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 187 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408291</link>
      <description>A struck-off company may be restored to the register under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 where the record shows continuing business activity and a bona fide willingness to cure pending statutory non-compliances. Audited balance sheets and other materials supported the company&#039;s claim of ongoing operations, and the Tribunal treated restoration as justified in the interests of the company, its shareholders, and creditors. Objections based on prior non-filing and reference to disqualification under Section 164(2) did not prevent revival on the facts presented, and restoration of the company&#039;s name was ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>