<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2039 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL — NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295486</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to not allow the interim resolution professional to withdraw from the corporate insolvency resolution process, emphasizing the Authority&#039;s discretion to discharge based on valid reasons. The Tribunal also affirmed the statutory provisions regarding the tenure of the interim resolution professional and the committee of creditors&#039; authority to decide on their appointment. It set aside the Authority&#039;s order imposing costs and disciplinary actions against the appellant, ensuring that the order would not impact the appellant&#039;s future engagements in insolvency proceedings. The appeal was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2039 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL — NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295486</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to not allow the interim resolution professional to withdraw from the corporate insolvency resolution process, emphasizing the Authority&#039;s discretion to discharge based on valid reasons. The Tribunal also affirmed the statutory provisions regarding the tenure of the interim resolution professional and the committee of creditors&#039; authority to decide on their appointment. It set aside the Authority&#039;s order imposing costs and disciplinary actions against the appellant, ensuring that the order would not impact the appellant&#039;s future engagements in insolvency proceedings. The appeal was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>