<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1390 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295492</link>
    <description>The Karnataka High Court dismissed the writ petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, as the cause of action arose in New Delhi and Uttarakhand, not in Karnataka. The Court emphasized that the location of the petitioner&#039;s registered office in Bangalore did not confer jurisdiction. The merits of the case were left open for consideration by the appropriate court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2021 08:35:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1390 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295492</link>
      <description>The Karnataka High Court dismissed the writ petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, as the cause of action arose in New Delhi and Uttarakhand, not in Karnataka. The Court emphasized that the location of the petitioner&#039;s registered office in Bangalore did not confer jurisdiction. The merits of the case were left open for consideration by the appropriate court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>