https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295500 An arbitral award should not be executed while objections under section 34 remain pending and the stay application has not been decided. In these circumstances, the Supreme Court directed transfer of the section 34 proceedings to the Delhi High Court to secure effective adjudication and avoid inequitable execution across multiple jurisdictions. The award was kept in abeyance until the Delhi High Court decided the stay application, and the award-holder was permitted to seek deposit of the awarded amount or part of it before that court. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jun 2021 08:35:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295500 An arbitral award should not be executed while objections under section 34 remain pending and the stay application has not been decided. In these circumstances, the Supreme Court directed transfer of the section 34 proceedings to the Delhi High Court to secure effective adjudication and avoid inequitable execution across multiple jurisdictions. The award was kept in abeyance until the Delhi High Court decided the stay application, and the award-holder was permitted to seek deposit of the awarded amount or part of it before that court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295500