<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 755 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295481</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the classification of interest income as &quot;Income from Other Sources,&quot; rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim that it should be considered as &quot;Income from Business.&quot; The Tribunal found that the interest income did not have a direct connection to the assessee&#039;s business activities, despite the assessee&#039;s arguments based on Ministry of Tourism directions and judicial precedents. The issues concerning the deduction for write-off of stores and spares and depreciation claim on stores and spares were not extensively addressed in the judgment, with the focus primarily on the interest income classification dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2021 15:17:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 755 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295481</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the classification of interest income as &quot;Income from Other Sources,&quot; rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim that it should be considered as &quot;Income from Business.&quot; The Tribunal found that the interest income did not have a direct connection to the assessee&#039;s business activities, despite the assessee&#039;s arguments based on Ministry of Tourism directions and judicial precedents. The issues concerning the deduction for write-off of stores and spares and depreciation claim on stores and spares were not extensively addressed in the judgment, with the focus primarily on the interest income classification dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>