https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295478 The earlier Constitution Bench exposition on exclusion of High Court jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 was binding under Article 141 because it formed part of the operative constitutional holding, not a passing observation; the High Court was therefore not entitled to take a contrary view. The Tribunal under the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal Act, 1997 also fell within Article 323B(2)(d), since "land reforms" is a broad constitutional field and is not confined to narrow agrarian reform. On that basis, the tribunal regime was upheld and the constitutional challenge failed. en-us Fri, 03 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Jun 2021 11:08:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295478 The earlier Constitution Bench exposition on exclusion of High Court jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 was binding under Article 141 because it formed part of the operative constitutional holding, not a passing observation; the High Court was therefore not entitled to take a contrary view. The Tribunal under the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal Act, 1997 also fell within Article 323B(2)(d), since "land reforms" is a broad constitutional field and is not confined to narrow agrarian reform. On that basis, the tribunal regime was upheld and the constitutional challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295478