<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 169 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408273</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order invoking Explanation 2 of Section 263 was without jurisdiction as the issues had already been decided by the CIT(A). The order was deemed invalid, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed, resulting in the quashing of the PCIT&#039;s order dated 24.04.2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2021 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 169 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408273</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order invoking Explanation 2 of Section 263 was without jurisdiction as the issues had already been decided by the CIT(A). The order was deemed invalid, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed, resulting in the quashing of the PCIT&#039;s order dated 24.04.2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>