<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 161 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408265</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the matter primarily involved contractual disputes over unpaid service charges, directing resolution through arbitration. It emphasized no hindrance to the Company&#039;s operations, allowing Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to pursue legal recourse for breach of the Service Facility Agreement. The application was disposed of with these directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2021 10:39:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 161 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408265</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the matter primarily involved contractual disputes over unpaid service charges, directing resolution through arbitration. It emphasized no hindrance to the Company&#039;s operations, allowing Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to pursue legal recourse for breach of the Service Facility Agreement. The application was disposed of with these directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>