https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408257 The Court granted relief to the petitioner, a manufacturing unit, by directing that no coercive measures be taken against them based on impugned notices seeking refund of CGST, interest, and penalty until the application for a special rate was adjudicated. The Court instructed the Commissioner of CGST to decide on the special rate application within four weeks and prohibited the CGST authorities from insisting on compliance with a specific remittance notice until the next listing date. The Court also left the issue of maintainability of the writ petition open for further examination, scheduling the case for the next listing date. en-us Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408257 The Court granted relief to the petitioner, a manufacturing unit, by directing that no coercive measures be taken against them based on impugned notices seeking refund of CGST, interest, and penalty until the application for a special rate was adjudicated. The Court instructed the Commissioner of CGST to decide on the special rate application within four weeks and prohibited the CGST authorities from insisting on compliance with a specific remittance notice until the next listing date. The Court also left the issue of maintainability of the writ petition open for further examination, scheduling the case for the next listing date. Case-Laws GST Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408257