<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1894 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295476</link>
    <description>A writ petition seeking certiorari and mandamus to quash an auction sale notice and restrain action affecting the petitioner&#039;s secondary charge was rendered infructuous when counsel conceded that no auction had been conducted. As no practical relief remained available, the HC declined to examine the merits of the sale notice or the alleged impact on the secondary charge and dismissed the petition as infructuous, with no costs and connected miscellaneous petitions closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2021 10:39:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1894 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295476</link>
      <description>A writ petition seeking certiorari and mandamus to quash an auction sale notice and restrain action affecting the petitioner&#039;s secondary charge was rendered infructuous when counsel conceded that no auction had been conducted. As no practical relief remained available, the HC declined to examine the merits of the sale notice or the alleged impact on the secondary charge and dismissed the petition as infructuous, with no costs and connected miscellaneous petitions closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>