<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 766 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295455</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that B.Ed. candidates were ineligible for lower primary/upper primary teacher posts in Kerala as per the advertisement&#039;s requirement of Teachers Training Certificate (TTC). The Court overturned the Division Bench&#039;s decision allowing B.Ed. candidates&#039; appointments, emphasizing the specificity of qualifications. It directed the exclusion of B.Ed. candidates from the rank list, reinstating appointments for TTC candidates. The State was instructed to amend rules for future appointments. The Single Judge&#039;s order was restored, granting equitable relief to TTC candidates and awarding costs to the appellants from the State.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 11:41:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 766 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295455</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that B.Ed. candidates were ineligible for lower primary/upper primary teacher posts in Kerala as per the advertisement&#039;s requirement of Teachers Training Certificate (TTC). The Court overturned the Division Bench&#039;s decision allowing B.Ed. candidates&#039; appointments, emphasizing the specificity of qualifications. It directed the exclusion of B.Ed. candidates from the rank list, reinstating appointments for TTC candidates. The State was instructed to amend rules for future appointments. The Single Judge&#039;s order was restored, granting equitable relief to TTC candidates and awarding costs to the appellants from the State.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>