<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 965 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295454</link>
    <description>Reservation under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act lapses if, after notice under Section 127, the authorities do not take effective acquisition steps within the statutory period; a bare resolution, proposal, or letter to the Collector is insufficient because commencement of acquisition is marked by the statutory declaration contemplated by Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act. The earlier interpretation of &quot;no steps as aforesaid&quot; was affirmed, with the expression confined to real acquisition action under the scheme of Sections 126 and 127, not preliminary administrative acts. The prior authorities were reconciled, no larger Bench reference was found necessary, and the impugned orders were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 11:27:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 965 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295454</link>
      <description>Reservation under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act lapses if, after notice under Section 127, the authorities do not take effective acquisition steps within the statutory period; a bare resolution, proposal, or letter to the Collector is insufficient because commencement of acquisition is marked by the statutory declaration contemplated by Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act. The earlier interpretation of &quot;no steps as aforesaid&quot; was affirmed, with the expression confined to real acquisition action under the scheme of Sections 126 and 127, not preliminary administrative acts. The prior authorities were reconciled, no larger Bench reference was found necessary, and the impugned orders were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>