<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 145 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408249</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the petitioner&#039;s contention that the interest amount should be spread over multiple years for tax assessment. However, as the petitioner failed to prove zero tax liability and the interest spreading would still attract tax, the Court dismissed the Writ Petition, stating that refund could only be ordered if no tax liability existed. The petitioner&#039;s inability to demonstrate zero tax liability led to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 145 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408249</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the petitioner&#039;s contention that the interest amount should be spread over multiple years for tax assessment. However, as the petitioner failed to prove zero tax liability and the interest spreading would still attract tax, the Court dismissed the Writ Petition, stating that refund could only be ordered if no tax liability existed. The petitioner&#039;s inability to demonstrate zero tax liability led to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>