<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 115 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408219</link>
    <description>The application filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016, was allowed, admitting the Corporate Debtor into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The moratorium was declared, and Mr. Umesh Ved was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The IA No. 882 of 2020 was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 08:24:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 115 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408219</link>
      <description>The application filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016, was allowed, admitting the Corporate Debtor into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The moratorium was declared, and Mr. Umesh Ved was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The IA No. 882 of 2020 was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>