https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295434 The Tribunal held jurisdiction to entertain the appeal regarding a refund claim for duty paid under protest without a show cause notice being issued. As no show cause notice was issued for the period in question, the appellant was entitled to the refund claim. The Tribunal found that no amount was pending against the appellant for recovery, as the demands had been confirmed but stayed by a previous order. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim and allowing the appeal with consequential relief. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Jun 2021 08:23:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295434 The Tribunal held jurisdiction to entertain the appeal regarding a refund claim for duty paid under protest without a show cause notice being issued. As no show cause notice was issued for the period in question, the appellant was entitled to the refund claim. The Tribunal found that no amount was pending against the appellant for recovery, as the demands had been confirmed but stayed by a previous order. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim and allowing the appeal with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295434