<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1914 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295446</link>
    <description>HC partially upheld petitioners&#039; challenge against GST authorities&#039; tax collection actions. Court suspended bank account attachments, mandating maintenance of current balances and minimum stock levels. The ruling questioned the jurisdictional validity of subsequent tax notices and provided interim relief, scheduling further proceedings to examine the coercive tax collection claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1914 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295446</link>
      <description>HC partially upheld petitioners&#039; challenge against GST authorities&#039; tax collection actions. Court suspended bank account attachments, mandating maintenance of current balances and minimum stock levels. The ruling questioned the jurisdictional validity of subsequent tax notices and provided interim relief, scheduling further proceedings to examine the coercive tax collection claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>