https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295445 The High Court concluded that it could not ignore the Supreme Court's directive, advising parties to seek clarification from the Supreme Court. It upheld the law-of-the-case doctrine, emphasizing the importance of judicial consistency and adherence to directives. The Court highlighted the need for disciplined self-consistency and directed the parties to approach the Supreme Court for clarification, refraining from adjudicating the case's merits. The amicus curiae's assistance was appreciated, and no costs order was issued. en-us Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Jun 2021 08:23:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295445 The High Court concluded that it could not ignore the Supreme Court's directive, advising parties to seek clarification from the Supreme Court. It upheld the law-of-the-case doctrine, emphasizing the importance of judicial consistency and adherence to directives. The Court highlighted the need for disciplined self-consistency and directed the parties to approach the Supreme Court for clarification, refraining from adjudicating the case's merits. The amicus curiae's assistance was appreciated, and no costs order was issued. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295445