<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 1019 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295431</link>
    <description>The appeal was against the Tribunal&#039;s order dated 10-9-2007 for the assessment year 2001-02, involving penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for disallowance of foreign travel expenses. The court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the respondent&#039;s counsel that there was no merit in challenging the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 16:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 1019 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295431</link>
      <description>The appeal was against the Tribunal&#039;s order dated 10-9-2007 for the assessment year 2001-02, involving penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for disallowance of foreign travel expenses. The court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the respondent&#039;s counsel that there was no merit in challenging the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>