<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1329 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295430</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the deletion of quantum additions. The decision was based on the principle that if the income is disclosed in the return, penalty for concealment is not applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 16:15:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1329 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295430</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the deletion of quantum additions. The decision was based on the principle that if the income is disclosed in the return, penalty for concealment is not applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>