<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 13 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25586</link>
    <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner on M/s. Kejriwal Iron Stores for discrepancies in payments and account books. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner could not introduce new grounds for penalty beyond those initiated by the Income-tax Officer under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Citing precedent, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, cancelling the penalty of Rs. 16,250 and directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:57:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 13 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25586</link>
      <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner on M/s. Kejriwal Iron Stores for discrepancies in payments and account books. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner could not introduce new grounds for penalty beyond those initiated by the Income-tax Officer under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Citing precedent, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, cancelling the penalty of Rs. 16,250 and directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>