https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408206 The court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondent Board to rework the contract terms post-GST implementation in accordance with the Government Order. It emphasized that the additional tax burden should be borne by the purchaser, not the petitioner. The court instructed the respondent to calculate the tax component in the contract price and conclude the reworking within a specified timeframe. Additionally, the court focused on the rights of the parties, ensuring the petitioner was not unfairly burdened with tax liability, and mandated the signing of a revised agreement within a stipulated period. en-us Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Jun 2021 14:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408206 The court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondent Board to rework the contract terms post-GST implementation in accordance with the Government Order. It emphasized that the additional tax burden should be borne by the purchaser, not the petitioner. The court instructed the respondent to calculate the tax component in the contract price and conclude the reworking within a specified timeframe. Additionally, the court focused on the rights of the parties, ensuring the petitioner was not unfairly burdened with tax liability, and mandated the signing of a revised agreement within a stipulated period. Case-Laws GST Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408206