<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 98 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act unjustified due to a defective notice lacking specificity on the nature of the charge. Citing precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the necessity for clear charges in penalty notices. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, aligning with prior rulings and higher judicial decisions. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:37:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 98 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act unjustified due to a defective notice lacking specificity on the nature of the charge. Citing precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the necessity for clear charges in penalty notices. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, aligning with prior rulings and higher judicial decisions. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>