<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 89 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408193</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai Bench, granted the Applicant&#039;s plea for restoration of the company&#039;s name in the Register maintained by the Respondent under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Despite compliance failures, the Tribunal exercised discretion, emphasizing the company&#039;s ongoing business activities evidenced by financial records. Specific directions were issued for compliance post-restoration, including filing pending returns, payment of costs, and adherence to statutory requirements within specified timelines. The judgment underscores the importance of compliance and the Tribunal&#039;s authority to restore struck-off company names based on evidence of business operations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:36:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 89 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408193</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai Bench, granted the Applicant&#039;s plea for restoration of the company&#039;s name in the Register maintained by the Respondent under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Despite compliance failures, the Tribunal exercised discretion, emphasizing the company&#039;s ongoing business activities evidenced by financial records. Specific directions were issued for compliance post-restoration, including filing pending returns, payment of costs, and adherence to statutory requirements within specified timelines. The judgment underscores the importance of compliance and the Tribunal&#039;s authority to restore struck-off company names based on evidence of business operations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>