<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1934 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295418</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision allowing depreciation on the &quot;license to collect toll&quot; as an intangible asset under section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that the right to collect toll qualifies as a depreciable intangible asset, based on consistent precedent and previous Tribunal rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:35:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1934 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295418</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision allowing depreciation on the &quot;license to collect toll&quot; as an intangible asset under section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that the right to collect toll qualifies as a depreciable intangible asset, based on consistent precedent and previous Tribunal rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>