<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 1137 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295410</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in the case. It confirmed that the consultancy charges were legitimate business expenditures, not related to a joint venture. Additionally, it ruled that losses from Non-EOUs do not need to be set off against profits of EOUs before computing deduction u/s 10B. Lastly, the Tribunal agreed that the interest rate charged by the assessee on funds advanced to AE was appropriate, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:35:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 1137 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295410</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in the case. It confirmed that the consultancy charges were legitimate business expenditures, not related to a joint venture. Additionally, it ruled that losses from Non-EOUs do not need to be set off against profits of EOUs before computing deduction u/s 10B. Lastly, the Tribunal agreed that the interest rate charged by the assessee on funds advanced to AE was appropriate, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>