<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 80 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408184</link>
    <description>Refund of IGST on export invoices for FY 2019-2020 was raised in the context of typographical errors in GST returns, where the GSTN portal did not permit correction. The matter concerns whether such return errors affected the refund claim and was listed for further consideration after notice was issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 80 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408184</link>
      <description>Refund of IGST on export invoices for FY 2019-2020 was raised in the context of typographical errors in GST returns, where the GSTN portal did not permit correction. The matter concerns whether such return errors affected the refund claim and was listed for further consideration after notice was issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>