https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408180 The court found that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to adequately address objections raised by the writ applicant regarding the reassessment proceedings. The court set aside the order disposing of objections and directed the AO to reconsider the matter, emphasizing the need for a proper application of mind. The AO was instructed to issue a fresh speaking order within six weeks, without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. The court highlighted the importance of a thorough and thoughtful consideration of objections in the reassessment process. en-us Tue, 11 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Jun 2021 08:40:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408180 The court found that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to adequately address objections raised by the writ applicant regarding the reassessment proceedings. The court set aside the order disposing of objections and directed the AO to reconsider the matter, emphasizing the need for a proper application of mind. The AO was instructed to issue a fresh speaking order within six weeks, without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. The court highlighted the importance of a thorough and thoughtful consideration of objections in the reassessment process. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 11 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408180