https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408164 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders. It held that the adjudicating authority erred in calculating the amount of credit to be reversed by not considering the value of trading services as per Explanation I(c) to Rule 6(3A) and by including total credit instead of only common input services. The demands based on incorrect computation were not sustained, and the appellant was granted consequential relief. en-us Tue, 25 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Jun 2021 08:39:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408164 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders. It held that the adjudicating authority erred in calculating the amount of credit to be reversed by not considering the value of trading services as per Explanation I(c) to Rule 6(3A) and by including total credit instead of only common input services. The demands based on incorrect computation were not sustained, and the appellant was granted consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408164