<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 59 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408163</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, quashing the tax withholding demands under section 201(1) r.w.s. 195. It concluded that the payments made were reimbursements of actual expenses, not taxable in India, and that vicarious liability under section 195 could not survive once the primary liability was negated. All other issues raised by the assessee were deemed infructuous and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2021 08:39:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 59 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408163</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, quashing the tax withholding demands under section 201(1) r.w.s. 195. It concluded that the payments made were reimbursements of actual expenses, not taxable in India, and that vicarious liability under section 195 could not survive once the primary liability was negated. All other issues raised by the assessee were deemed infructuous and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>