<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 56 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408160</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the revision order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the Principal Commissioner wrongly assumed an additional loan was squared up. The Tribunal held that the decision was based on incorrect assumptions, criticizing the Principal Commissioner for not reviewing details already on record. The appeal of the assessee, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and services, was allowed, with the judgment pronounced on 27/04/2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2021 08:39:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 56 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408160</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the revision order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the Principal Commissioner wrongly assumed an additional loan was squared up. The Tribunal held that the decision was based on incorrect assumptions, criticizing the Principal Commissioner for not reviewing details already on record. The appeal of the assessee, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and services, was allowed, with the judgment pronounced on 27/04/2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>