<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 50 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408154</link>
    <description>The insolvency application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was rejected by the Tribunal due to the existence of a pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding the quality of goods supplied. The respondent had raised concerns about the goods&#039; quality before the demand notice, supported by documentary evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a genuine dispute to reject an insolvency application, leading to the dismissal of the petition. The rejection did not prejudge the underlying issues, allowing the applicant to seek remedies through other legal avenues. Compliance and information dissemination were ordered to the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2021 08:39:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 50 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408154</link>
      <description>The insolvency application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was rejected by the Tribunal due to the existence of a pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding the quality of goods supplied. The respondent had raised concerns about the goods&#039; quality before the demand notice, supported by documentary evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a genuine dispute to reject an insolvency application, leading to the dismissal of the petition. The rejection did not prejudge the underlying issues, allowing the applicant to seek remedies through other legal avenues. Compliance and information dissemination were ordered to the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>