https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408144 The appeals filed by the appellants were rejected. The adjudicating authority upheld the confiscation of goods and the imposition of penalties, concluding that the appellants had intentionally failed to comply with the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017, with the intent to evade tax. The procedural lapses claimed by the appellants were dismissed, and the judicial precedents cited were deemed inapplicable. en-us Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408144 The appeals filed by the appellants were rejected. The adjudicating authority upheld the confiscation of goods and the imposition of penalties, concluding that the appellants had intentionally failed to comply with the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017, with the intent to evade tax. The procedural lapses claimed by the appellants were dismissed, and the judicial precedents cited were deemed inapplicable. Case-Laws GST Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408144