https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295402 The proceeding concerned an alleged contravention under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, with the petitioners seeking quashing of the criminal case and cognizance order under Section 482 CrPC, and alternatively asking that the matter remain in abeyance while their withdrawal request was considered. The court directed the Board to decide the request for withdrawal of prosecution within three weeks, restrained the Special Court from proceeding during that period, and left the petitioners free to seek quashing again if advised. en-us Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Jun 2021 08:37:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295402 The proceeding concerned an alleged contravention under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, with the petitioners seeking quashing of the criminal case and cognizance order under Section 482 CrPC, and alternatively asking that the matter remain in abeyance while their withdrawal request was considered. The court directed the Board to decide the request for withdrawal of prosecution within three weeks, restrained the Special Court from proceeding during that period, and left the petitioners free to seek quashing again if advised. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295402