<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 21 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25569</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court did not decide whether properties allotted to the wife and two sons under a 1970 partition decree were excludible from the assessee&#039;s net wealth. Recognising that the issue involved the incidents of property and the scope and effect of partition under the Dayabhaga school, the court directed the Tribunal to state a case and refer the specific question of law for determination. It also allowed both sides to argue all relevant matters, including the Revenue&#039;s past conduct and the effect of prior wealth-tax and income-tax assessments. The applications were disposed of without adjudicating the substantive wealth inclusion question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:07:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 21 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25569</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court did not decide whether properties allotted to the wife and two sons under a 1970 partition decree were excludible from the assessee&#039;s net wealth. Recognising that the issue involved the incidents of property and the scope and effect of partition under the Dayabhaga school, the court directed the Tribunal to state a case and refer the specific question of law for determination. It also allowed both sides to argue all relevant matters, including the Revenue&#039;s past conduct and the effect of prior wealth-tax and income-tax assessments. The applications were disposed of without adjudicating the substantive wealth inclusion question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>