https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295382 A statutory amendment empowering the Majlis to remove a mutwalli for wilful disobedience could validly be applied to antecedent misconduct, because the power operated prospectively even though it addressed prior orders and directions; there was no vested right to retain office after established mismanagement. The statutory scheme also allowed the Sadr to act where urgent action was needed and a Majlis could not be convened in time, including temporary appointment after persistent disobedience. The constitutional challenge to sections 27 and 32 of the Bihar Waqfs Act, 1947 failed, as the provisions were upheld as part of a public-interest framework for waqf supervision and administration. en-us Mon, 23 Nov 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Jun 2021 15:52:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295382 A statutory amendment empowering the Majlis to remove a mutwalli for wilful disobedience could validly be applied to antecedent misconduct, because the power operated prospectively even though it addressed prior orders and directions; there was no vested right to retain office after established mismanagement. The statutory scheme also allowed the Sadr to act where urgent action was needed and a Majlis could not be convened in time, including temporary appointment after persistent disobedience. The constitutional challenge to sections 27 and 32 of the Bihar Waqfs Act, 1947 failed, as the provisions were upheld as part of a public-interest framework for waqf supervision and administration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Nov 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295382