<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 34 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408138</link>
    <description>The court granted an extension of time for filing attested affidavits, allowed the deletion of respondent no.2 from the array of parties, appointed respondent no.4 subject to the final outcome, and permitted the impleadment of affected assessee(s). The petitioner was directed to comply with specific timelines and requirements outlined by the court in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 34 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408138</link>
      <description>The court granted an extension of time for filing attested affidavits, allowed the deletion of respondent no.2 from the array of parties, appointed respondent no.4 subject to the final outcome, and permitted the impleadment of affected assessee(s). The petitioner was directed to comply with specific timelines and requirements outlined by the court in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>