https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408132 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief deemed appropriate. The denial of credit on returned goods under Rule 16(1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 was deemed unjustifiable in law due to faulty investigation processes, including the lack of inquiry at the recipient's end and the absence of crucial documents on record. en-us Fri, 28 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408132 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief deemed appropriate. The denial of credit on returned goods under Rule 16(1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 was deemed unjustifiable in law due to faulty investigation processes, including the lack of inquiry at the recipient's end and the absence of crucial documents on record. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408132